Jump to Navigation
  • NBC News
  • CBS News
  • Fox News Channel
  • North Bay | Business Journal | North San Francisco Bay Area
  • San Francisco Chronicle
  • AV | AV Preeminent | Martindale Hubbell Lawyer Ratings
  • Super Lawyers
  • Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb

Construction Update: New law changes method of handling defect issues

http://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com
© 2003 North Bay Business Journal
(Reprinted with Permission)

BY JEFFREY LERMAN
The new Homebuilder Fix It Construction Dispute Resolution law, SB 800, affects all purchasers of new homes or condos closing after January 1, 2003. A detailed review of this extensive statute (covering about 20 pages of fine print) is beyond the scope of this article. However, every homeowner affected by this statute must be aware of the following five traps.

Filing too late

Before this new law, if homeowners wanted to assert a construction defect claim, all they needed to do was figure out which of a few possible theories of liability applied and how long they had to commence legal action based on that theory. SB 800 changes all that.

First, sprinkled throughout the massive statute are 11 separately prescribed time limits for bringing legal action, depending on what type of defect is involved. What happens if you have a defect that falls into more than one category? To be safe, assert your action within the shorter time limit.

Second, the new legislation changes when the clock starts running. Instead of commencing on the date the defect was discovered, as before, all statutes of limitation now start at the close of escrow. Unsuspecting homeowners may inadvertently miss a filing deadline by not realizing this important fact.

Third, the four-year statute of repose for patent (visible) defects and the 10-year statute of repose for latent (hidden) defects no longer apply to actions under this statute. So, whereas before, homeowners could take some comfort that they would have a remedy if they did not (or could not) discover a problem with, for example, the plumbing until many years after taking occupancy, those same homeowners could be prevented from seeking redress for that problem under the new law.

Inadequate documentation

The new law lulls the unprepared homeowner into a false sense of security by requiring the contractor to turn over potentially hundreds of pages of documents such as plans, specifications, soils reports, DRE public reports, and engineering calculations. Homeowners may be impressed and intimidated by the sheer volume. After searching fruitlessly through these documents for smoking-gun proof that the contractor committed some actionable error, weary homeowners may reluctantly agree to a settlement that is significantly less than what they might otherwise be entitled to.

Any experienced construction lawyer knows, however, that the most incriminating documents are hidden where homeowners would never see them under this voluntary production procedure: in the contractor's job or project file, internal notes, and correspondence file. The only way to get these critical documents (assuming the contractor does not turn them over with the other documents) is through formal discovery in the context of arbitration or court action.

Failing to maintain the home

The statute provides that a builder may be excused in whole or part from liability if, among other things, a homeowner fails to follow the builder's or manufacturer's recommendations or "commonly accepted homeowner maintenance obligations," provided the builder gave written notice of these recommendations and guidelines at the time of sale, and they were reasonable.

No doubt numerous disputes will arise as to what recommendations and guidelines the homeowner actually had notice of, and whether they were reasonable. The homeowner's best defense is to keep detailed records of all communications to and from the contractor. Be proactive. Document an inquiry to the contractor upon substantial completion asking him to advise you of any maintenance obligations he believes apply to your home. Then, follow those procedures and document your efforts with a home maintenance journal, receipts, pictures, etc.

Giving an overly-broad release

Surprisingly, the new rules discourage contractors from engaging in one of the most common and successful settlement practices: fixing the problem themselves. Contractors trying to do the right thing under the new law are effectively penalized by a prohibition on their ability to ask for or receive a release for the defect that has been fixed.

Now, the only way a contractor can secure that release is by paying cash. The danger for homeowners is that in many of these repairs, the true cost is unknown until the fix is fully completed. So, unless homeowners want to front the money themselves, they are taking the substantial risk that the cash compromise may fall short of what is actually needed to get the job done. Further, prudent homeowners must be on guard to make sure that any release given is drafted as narrowly as possible. Otherwise, there may be a rude awakening when it is discovered that the release covers a portion of the home that is not part of the affected area and that later requires repairs.

Failing to assert available remedies

The statute repeatedly characterizes its dispute resolution procedures as nonadversarial. It is anything but.

To the extent the law mandates a forced alternative dispute resolution procedure that is pre-arbitration and pre-court action, it is nonadversarial. However, it is folly to think that, when tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars are at stake, the name of the game is anything other than shifting as much of the responsibility of paying for the necessary repairs to the other party. And that is about as adversarial as it gets.

Homeowners involved in significant claims should be neither hypnotized nor fooled by the word "nonadversarial" in the statute. Rather, they should recognize that even under this new law, the odds are that to recover the maximum remedy for construction defects, they will be well-served by retaining competent counsel early in the process to help guide them through the maze of construction defect litigation -- a maze that this new law has just made even more confusing and perilous.

San Rafael Real Estate Investor Lawyers Video

Past clients discuss their experiences with Lerman Law Partners (1.27)

GET STARTED

Help Me… Top Rated by Peers and Clients
AV LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability

AV® Preeminent™ (4.5-5.0) - An AV® certification mark is a significant rating accomplishment - a testament to the fact that a lawyer's peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence. *

Super Lawyers

Jeffrey H. Lerman has been selected for inclusion in 2013 Super Lawyers. Only 5% of the lawyers in the state were so selected.

Michelle C. Lerman has been selected for inclusion in 2009 and 2010 Super Lawyers. Only 5% of the lawyers in the state were so selected.

* CV, BV, and AV are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards, and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards.

AVVO Rating 10.0 | Superb

Michelle C. Lerman voted #1 Favorite Attorney for Marin/Sonoma

“J. Weekly” Newsmagazine Readers’ Choice Award 2007

Lerman Law Partners News



See Michelle Lerman's upcoming live Estate Planning seminars:

Click here for more information.


Jeff Lerman Spoke At Investor Education Institute Series' Workshop:

The Ultimate Commercial Loan Workout Symposium:
For Distress to Success

**

Save your commercial property from foreclosure under the new rules for commercial loan workouts. Learn secrets to a successful distressed loan workout...even if your property is "Underwater."

8-Part Home Study Course Now Available!

Click here for more details and to purchase home study course online

"One of the best programs I have attended. Excellent array of speakers." -- Nachman Flatt, CPA, Calabasas, CA

"Great speakers...very informative...great investment of my time." -- Leon Katz


Jeff Lerman Spoke At Investor Education Institute Series' Workshop:

STRATEGIC DEFAULTS IN CALIFORNIA
What Every California Homeowner Must Know

**

Get the tools, checklists, formulas and information you need to make this important decision

4-Hour Home Study Course Now Available!

Click here for more details and to purchase home study course online

"Your webinar is the only guidance we have gotten that put all aspects and consequences into one package. Now, we believe we have the necessary tools to make a decision on our unique situation."          Scott and Kim R. of San Ramon

"Comprehensive, understandable, and usable content."                                                                 Jean-Marc Landau

 

Office Locations
  • San Rafael
  • Century City
  • Glendale
  • San Francisco
  • Santa Clara
  • San Mateo
  • Woodland Hills
  • Berkeley
  • San Bruno